Why does media ignore Charlene and Paige

Listened to Victoria Derbyshire on radio 5 @ 10am today – she was talking to the father of Emily Longley, who was murdered by Elliot Turner – whose parents tried to cover it up.

It was a very emotional interview – heartbreaking for any parent to lose a child like this.

But I was thinking about Paige and Charlene. Why are these girls ignored by the media, infact Anne Botting and guests (Bercow and Dale) have laughed about the murder of Charlene

Is it coz they iz white, working class
Is it coz the murderers (I know there are no convictions) are from an ethnic group
Is it coz they are muslim

You would think that these events had all the ingredients for the media – unsolved murders, young girls.

WHyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy

Rochdale muslim councillors support child groomer

Abdul Qayyum barristers Phillip Boyd read out a series of references speaking up for his client to the jury. One of them from Councillor Aftab Hussain said: “I have known Abdul Qayyum for the last 10 years as a local resident in the area. He lives with his wife and two children. Mr Qayyum is a hard-working person.

He has worked hard throughout his life. Within the community, he comes across very well and I have never seen or heard of any wrongdoing before this case. I personally was shocked to hear about this news.” Councillor Zulfiqar Ali, a former Mayor of Rochdale, wrote: “I have known Mr Abdul Qayyum since the 1990s when he arrived in Rochdale. “He has lived in Rochdale all of this time.

(Rochdale observer link)

On May 17th Clive Jefferson from the BNP tel: Rochdale council and was told he COULD attend a public meeting – when he got there he was told the meeting was closed.

(BNP link)

I presume the councillors who supported the (white) child abuser were allowed into the meeting.

I would like to know what the Labour and Liberal parties think of these men?

(PS – I apologise for using the word groomer in the title – I have no desire to have this blog deleted as I want to draw attention to the councillors who supported these men – I would like to call it what it is, but these days we must be careful what we say, when we say, and how we say it – the truth, it seems, will have to wait)

What Geert Wilders’ book taught me

I’ve just finished ‘marked for death’ – this is what it taught me:-

.Islam has a violent history, Mohammed was a violent man.
.Islam has engaged in slavery, and continues to do so.
.Mohammed made up the Koran to suit his own selfish needs.

.The west is unable to address the violence and anti-social attitudes within Islam because of moral relativism.
.The west is reliant (to some extent) upon oil and money from islamic countries.

Now critics of Wilders will no doubt say ‘ofcourse he sais that – he is a racist, an islamaphobe, and he doea not know what he is talking about’.

Fair enough – let’s have the debate – but the FACT that he is ‘marked for death’ suggests he does know what he is saying.

So when a muslim claims he comes from the religion of peace, and if you say otherwise you will be killed – is not irony – it is violence, it is harassment, it is intimidation
.
If you call wilders a racist – does he call upon his supporters to kill?